SVG Opus #18
6.9
Evaluation
6.9 avg
7.5 physics accuracy
8 design quality
6.5 animation quality
5 slider ux
7.5 completeness
7 overall
Two crowns Same mass, different density Vertical slider Slider works Slider controls crowns Slider direction correct Full slider range Fall animation Water displacement Rising water level Splash effects Physics correct Live mass value Live volume value Live density value Live displaced water Gilded displaces more Heureka animation No external deps Light bg / dark text Self-contained HTML

Slider direction is inverted (min=0 at top maps crowns to air which is correct in logic, but the CSS rotation trick means the visual top of the slider corresponds to value=0/air and bottom to value=100/water — actually let me re-examine: the slider has min=0 value=0 and is CSS-rotated -90deg, so visually the left becomes top; slider_direction_correct is ambiguous but the rotated horizontal slider's "top" visually is the max end, making value=100 at top = fully submerged, which is inverted); no fall animation (crowns teleport linearly rather than dropping with gravity/easing); splash and heureka are well-implemented but the submerged-fraction calculation ignores the rising water surface, slightly underreporting displacement.

14,418 output tokens · claude-opus-4-6 · end_turn

Slider direction is inverted (min=0 at top maps crowns to air which is correct in logic, but the CSS rotation trick means the visual top of the slider corresponds to value=0/air and bottom to value=100/water — actually let me re-examine: the slider has min=0 value=0 and is CSS-rotated -90deg, so visually the left becomes top; slider_direction_correct is ambiguous but the rotated horizontal slider's "top" visually is the max end, making value=100 at top = fully submerged, which is inverted); no fall animation (crowns teleport linearly rather than dropping with gravity/easing); splash and heureka are well-implemented but the submerged-fraction calculation ignores the rising water surface, slightly underreporting displacement.